Women are walking through a village in Afghanistan.
Women in Afghanistan.
© Nava Jamshidi/WHI/Fairpicture

As international funding declined in 2025, pressure on local healthcare systems around the world intensified. The impact is particularly severe in fragile contexts, where the most vulnerable are hardest hit and hard-won progress in maternal and child health is put at risk.

Published 9 April 2026

Please note: To use our resources as efficiently as possible, we used AI-based tools to support the translation of this page. Despite careful review, the translation may contain occasional errors or inaccuracies. Thank you for your understanding.

Women in labour, children with diarrhoea, older people with fever: in 2025, they increasingly found the doors of healthcare facilities closed. In Afghanistan alone, 422 health centres had to shut down after governments around the world cut their development funding. Today, one in three people in the country no longer has access to basic healthcare.
 

What we are witnessing is a profound shift in international development cooperation. Governments in traditional donor countries are cutting budgets or deliberately reallocating funds. There is a growing trend away from long-term poverty reduction and public healthcare towards domestic and security policy spending and geopolitical influence.
 

In fragile and crisis-affected countries, where healthcare systems are chronically underfunded, the loss of external funding does not simply mean a reduction in services. It can lead to the collapse of essential systems that national structures cannot compensate for in the short term.

People in front of tents.
An uncertain future: refugees in the camp at Abougoudam, Chad.
© Kevin Doumdedje/WHI

A Painful Setback

The consequences are particularly severe for maternal and child health. Women and girls are often the first to lose access to medical care. In Bangladesh, for example, the government restricted the delivery of medicines and medical equipment in our project region, with drastic consequences for pregnant women, mothers and newborns. In Ethiopia, our local partner, the Organization for Welfare and Development in Action (OWDA), reports that funding cuts have left it unable to reach around 80,000 particularly vulnerable people. The Ministry of Health has also had to lay off approximately 5,000 staff members, while around 200 NGOs have been forced to adapt or discontinue their projects.
 

These developments are deeply troubling. They shift the focus away from sustainable capacity-building towards short-term measures that cannot close fundamental gaps in healthcare provision. As a result, progress in reducing maternal and child mortality is at risk of being lost. One thing is clear to us: maternal and child health is not a marginal technical issue, but a barometer of global solidarity. When funding is cut in this area, it reveals which lives are considered worth protecting – and which are not.
 

Despite declining government support for international solidarity, backing from institutions and private individuals remained consistently strong throughout 2025. This solidarity strengthens our resolve and enables us to continue standing alongside the most vulnerable.

Notsituation im Bangladesch
Prekäre Lage in fdsfs für Frauen und Kinder